Is it possible I am related to someone this cute?

Gio
Is it possible I am related to someone this cute?

I am the last person who should be surprised by a young person. I interact with them often. I hear their stories. I see them rise to challenges with grace and poise. I tell other adults that they should have for faith, belief and trust in young people.
But today I fell into the trap. I let me eyes fool me. I missed it.
We spent the day on retreat with 113 ninth graders. A good time was had be all (or at least most).
Simple day. Opening prayer. Icebreakers and small group. We did a presentation. Lunch. More activities. Us again. Closing prayer.
They were a lively group. Lunch was a challenge. There was no microphone in the hall were we had lunch. Giving instructions was a chore. At one point, one of the teachers said, “If you offered this class a million dollars to stop talking, they wouldn’t do it.”
By the time we had gotten to the second presentation we has sufficiently blurred the lines between audience and stage. Our goal, but sometimes it is hard to reign them back in to do the meaty stuff.
Not that this is bad. We want energy. We want participation. But sometimes a 14 year old boy doesn’t know where the line is.
That is fine. We expect that.
To start the second session we opened the floor to questions and answers. One particularly kinetic young man asked lost of questions. He also had a comment or two for may of the things we said.
As time was winding down we had a chance for a few more questions and there was only one had up. His.
So, I called on him.
His question was something like, “You know the story were the rich man asks Jesus what he needs to do to get into heaven and Jesus tells him to sell everything? Why do we have all these beautiful churches and huge organs and million dollar things. Shouldn’t we sell all that stuff and give it to the poor in Africa and here?”
Translation, “How do we live this faith we profess?”
I missed it. I never would have guessed that is what is going on in his head and heart.
Good for him.
Shame on me.
[join me today]
Dashing in and out the door. Because of weather, I got in late last night (well past midnight) and am getting less than 18 hrs at home be flying out again.
Doing laundry takes residence over writing.
Could you please join me with this.
For some reason the list is longer than a normal Monday morning.
It hard not to root for Jim Leland and the Tigers.
At the same time, it is really hard to root for Kenny Rodgers (the pitcher, not the singer).
A few things that have helped me find my way.
1) direct service: I have found that when I bump into the Body of Christ in the world I am transformed. All is put into perspective. I see others (and therefore myself) for who they are, part of the whole, which is impossible to break. Our feeling of separation is illusion, an illusion that it created by the thinking mind. Moments with you go to someone else need and just be with them (not fix them) can transform. The word “direct” is used because this is not sorting clothing or boxing food. You must be in relationship.
2) “The Power of Now” by Eckhart Tolle: Feelings of unworthiness are rooted in the past. Feeling of fear are rooted in the future. The only place we can live (and can know God’s peace) is in the now. Nothing else exists. Because we perceive things in the past as “bad” and we can’t leave them we see ourselves a failing. Because we worry that things in the future are going to lead to pain and death, we worry about them and loose this moment. Happiness is dependant on us perceiving the present situation as positive. Joy, which is at the level of our core/soul, does not.
The book might seem hokey and new-agey. Take it for what it is, a new perspective. It might work, it might not, but it will challenge you and how you perceive truth. But it is safe because truth cannot be challenged. “Nothing real can be threatened. Nothing unreal exists.” We just loose our way something in remembering the truth that is inside us, always.
3) Long walks in a cold wind: For some reason I have never been able to lie to a cold wind, even when I could lie to myself. For some reason a cool (and I mean winter in Wyoming cold) just cuts to the core. It can see what is inside. I can’t lie.
4) Old Chicago and old Garth Brooks: I wish I could explain this, but for some reason cheesy love songs from the eighties and cheese country form the late eighties and early nineties puts the world in perspective.
[pray]
Sometimes it is hard to say out loud, to people I have just met, that I am a Catholic (with all the current scandal) and Christian (because of the certain flavor of Christian which has taken over the political landscape).
Whenever Catholics or Christians are portrayed in TV or movies it is usually some characture of these things I fear. But from time to time there is an exception.
I don’t watch much TV and it has been years since I have followed a show regularly, but this season, that has changed. I have been sucked into NBC “Studio 60″.
Patton Dodd over at Idol Chatter offers this reflection on one of the characters of the show. [link to full article below]:
[full article | prayer]
You are just a few laughs away from letting a whole lot of good stuff in. You are just a few kisses away from letting a whole lot of good stuff in. You are just a little bit of relief away from letting a whole lot of good stuff in.
prayer
[via mom]
“The secret of a good sermon is to have a good beginning and a good ending, then having the two as close together as possible.”
-George Burns (1896 – 1996)
More importantly, Harriet is an accurate representation of a fact rarely mentioned: Evangelicals aren’t just (and aren’t all) politically active home-schoolers and megachurch-goers. They are also people who live and work in every aspect of the marketplace, including (gasp!) the entertainment media. That’s right: When you’re watching “That ’70s Show,” attending a Broadway play, and listening to a favorite indie pop song, you’re often being entertained by evangelicals, unawares.
I mention this not as a triumph of evangelicalism (perish the thought), but just to note that Sorkin is making sense of the poles of religion in American life. What seems aggravatingly abnormal in some instances–crazy Christians–has an astonishingly familiar, and more congenial, face in other instances. Sorkin seems to understand that evangelicalism is more than the sum of its parts. Thus far in “Studio 60,” he’s achieving something resembling a fair representation of evangelicals: They are those boycotters, those megaphones of moral values; but they are also men and women whose personal expressions of faith are more complicated and nuanced than the big picture reveals.